Bayesian adjustment for exposure misclassification in case-control studies.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Poor measurement of explanatory variables occurs frequently in observational studies. Error-prone observations may lead to biased estimation and loss of power in detecting the impact of explanatory variables on the response. We consider misclassified binary exposure in the context of case-control studies, assuming the availability of validation data to inform the magnitude of the misclassification. A Bayesian adjustment to correct the misclassification is investigated. Simulation studies show that the Bayesian method can have advantages over non-Bayesian counterparts, particularly in the face of a rare exposure, small validation sample sizes, and uncertainty about whether exposure misclassification is differential or non-differential. The method is illustrated via application to several real studies.
منابع مشابه
تعدیل اریبی نسبت شانس حاصل از طبقهبندی نادرست مواجههها با استفاده از روشهای بیزی در بررسی عوامل محیطی مرتبط با سرطان ریه
Background & Objective: Inability to measure exact exposure in epidemiological studies is a common problem in many studies, especially cross-sectional studies. Depending on the extent of misclassification, results may be affected. Existing methods for solving this problem require a lot of time and money and it is not practical for some of the exposures. Recently, new methods have been proposed ...
متن کاملIs probabilistic bias analysis approximately Bayesian?
Case-control studies are particularly susceptible to differential exposure misclassification when exposure status is determined following incident case status. Probabilistic bias analysis methods have been developed as ways to adjust standard effect estimates based on the sensitivity and specificity of exposure misclassification. The iterative sampling method advocated in probabilistic bias ana...
متن کاملBayesian sample size determination for case-control studies when exposure may be misclassified.
Odds ratios are frequently used for estimating the effect of an exposure on the probability of disease in case-control studies. In planning such studies, methods for sample size determination are required to ensure sufficient accuracy in estimating odds ratios once the data are collected. Often, the exposure used in epidemiologic studies is not perfectly ascertained. This can arise from recall ...
متن کاملDiabetes mellitus and hypertension increase the risk of colorectal cancer mortality; a robust Bayesian adjustment analysis
Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of diabetes and hypertension on colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality. Background One of the methodology in epidemiological studies is to use self-report questionnaires to gather data, this is the easiest and cheapest method but involves with misclassification bias. We use robust Bayesian adjustment to correct this bias. Methods One of the...
متن کاملA comparison of sensitivity-specificity imputation, direct imputation and fully Bayesian analysis to adjust for exposure misclassification when validation data are unavailable.
Purpose Measurement error is an important source of bias in epidemiological studies. We illustrate three approaches to sensitivity analysis for the effect of measurement error: imputation of the 'true' exposure based on specifying the sensitivity and specificity of the measured exposure (SS); direct imputation (DI) using a regression model for the predictive values; and adjustment based on a fu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Statistics in medicine
دوره 29 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010